Godfrey-Smith (1996) talks about three epistemological approaches: An “externalist” approach, an “internalist” approach, and interactionism.
The epistemic ontology of those of us who hold the externalistic approach is that we come to gain knowledge as external facts become exposed to us. Godfrey-Smith likens this approach to the Associationist Theory, and behaviorism. This brings to mind the dialectic discourse of Lakatos, who believed we could cleave ourselves from our emotional and political attachment to ideas, and that we could collaboratively find scientific truth through honest debate.
The internalistic approach is that we never perceive the external world without our view being adulterated by our internal cognition. He calls this approach “strong constructivism“, or a “Kantian” approach. How we perceive the world depends on our experiences, cf, what I presume Aristotle, Mauss, and Bourdieu would call “habitus“. However, I cannot understand the correlation he makes…
View original post 118 more words